Democrats are beginning to deal with the biggest sleeping problem in politics

Senator Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.) He is proposing to AI companies to contribute some of their “huge profits” to a fund dedicated to helping US workers and communities to deal with the probable losses of jobs and infrastructure tension caused by technology, a sign that the Democratic Party is beginning to fight with what is expected to be a great line of failures in the policy during the policy The next decision.

Kelly, a Swing state senator and potential presidential candidate of 2028, launched the idea in a white paper with the aim of creating “an AI boom for all, not another technological bubble for a few.” It is unlikely that it is the only important democrat with ideas about how the party must deal with a projected technology to replace 7% of all US works during the next decade and change the way millions of jobs work. The speed and size of the changes could lead to AI of being a concern of the joint room today to a concern of the kitchen table when the voters go to the surveys in 2028.

“There is a good possibility that this is one of the main issues that concern voters,” said Bharat Ramamurti, former deputy director of the National Economic Council under President Joe Biden. “I think it is very likely that they see their work changing or disappearing due to the AI, or someone in their family, or listening in the news all the time on how certain companies are reducing workers due to the adoption of AI, and will want responses from policy formulators.”

It is likely that AI reaches the hardest white collar use, which means that it could cause great economic problems for voters educated in the university and the expensive metropolitan areas that make up the base of the Democratic Party. The growing probability of a recession in the coming years could also accelerate employers’ plans to adopt AI and fire workers.

Via News

At the same time, the construction of data centers that work with AI, which put tensions in the electricity network, has become a point of inflammation in cities and cities throughout the country, and concerns about the potential of AI to cause real -life damage are beginning to alarm legislators in both parties.

Kelly’s White Paper aims to start at least one conversation on how to address all these problems, with a “AI horizon background” proposed as its centerpiece. The plan floats several potential rates or taxes that AI companies could pay in the background, including taxing the “large -scale use of public resources, such as power, water and land; [p]Rofits of digital advertisement tools fed by AI; or unexpected income of income based on AI “. The fund would remain separated from the normal assignments process of the Congress.

The background money would be used to improve the necessary infrastructure, finance clean energy and national supply chains and help workers who lost their jobs due to AI. (The plan repeatedly observes the previous federal efforts to help workers displaced by technology, such as the commercial adjustment assistance program, it is believed that they have fallen short).

“It is common sense to take advantage of the enormous profits of large companies that develop and implement AI so that innovation thrives, the opportunity is shared and each community benefits,” says the document.

Kelly, who was the best contender for the vice presidential post in a ticket with 2024 Nominated Democrat Kamala Harris, has already seen some political fights on AI in his native state: the Tucson City Council voted against a data center linked to Amazon last month about the concerns about the amount of water he would use.

Even so, the political battles on AI are in their childhood: a skirmish during a 10 -year prohibition of the AI ​​regulations at the state level that will be included in the Budget Law of the Republican Party ended with the eliminated prohibition of the eventual law signed by President Donald Trump.

And the AI ​​industry has launched a super pacLeading the future, with $ 100 million in funds and a mandate to “oppose the policies that suffocate innovation, allow China to obtain the global superiority of AI or make it more difficult to bring the benefits of AI to the world and those who support that agenda.”

But Ramamurti believes that there will be real long -term political benefits of being a leader on the subject.

“If you are a candidate in 2028, you will need to be able to talk about your plan to make sure people benefit from this in general,” he said. “And I think voters will respect him if you are not a Johnny-Come-Lathe to this issue.”