Experts are playing the alarm in Jeanine Pirro

Experts are playing the alarm in Jeanine Pirro

Paul Nguyen faced up to eight years in prison for allegedly assaulting an agent of the National Security Department during the federal acquisition of President Donald Trump in Washington, DC

But like many other cases of severe crime assault recently presented by Jeanine Pirro, the former News presenter became US DC prosecutor, the position against Nguyen collapsed in less than a month.

A prosecutor from the Pirro office told a judge magistrate on Tuesday that the office no longer plans to present “current evidence” positions, a strong indication that, after reviewing the images of the body of the body and the statements of witnesses, he does not believe he has a case. Nguyen had been accused of hurting the DHS agent during an early morning fight along one of the city’s nightlife strips.

Maryland’s resident said he will not forget the four nights that happened in the DC prison, all for a position that would soon retire.

“It was the most terrifying experience of my life,” said Nguyen, pointing out the documented asset of the installation Cockroach problem and rodents.

Many recent defendants in the United States District Court of DC can be related to the case of Nguyen.

Pirro’s office has brought a range of charges Accuse people of attacking federal officers or threatening the president, just so that cases do not reach any part as serious crimes. Meanwhile, the defendants have spent days in jail, feared years in prison and have seen their names in the news, everything seems to defend lawyers, at the service of promoting Trump’s repression politically.

In several cases, the great jurors “have not billed the cases, or have refused to return the accusations, a very unusual fact, since the prosecutors greatly control the process of the grand jury. But in other cases, the prosecutors simply have degraded the position to a minor crime or have abandoned it completely, apparently without the rejection of a great jury. The defense lawyers say that the charges of severe crime take time of jail and concern.

“Routinely cowardly serious crimes even in trivial cases just because you want to seem difficult that you are … not doing your job.”

– Randall Eliason, Professor of Law and former Prosecutor

The magistrate judges of the District Court seem to be losing patience.

Matthew J. Sharbaugh, who dismissed the case of Nguyen, asked the prosecutor at Tuesday’s hearing if he knew how many cases, the Pirro office had accused in the last month and then tried to dismiss after a greater reflection, often the night before the accused should in the Court.

“Would you surprise you to know what is 11?” Sharbaugh asked, explaining that such cases had become so frequent that he had employees who compiled them.

Just an hour before Nguyen’s audience, Sharbaugh had dismissed another alleged assault case in similar circumstances. The prosecutors had accused a DC man of spitting two members of the National Guard while he died in a Scooter near the Union station, but asked the court to dismiss the position of serious crime “after reviewing the evidence.” The man now faces a less serious crime in the court of the city.

Sharbauch said it seemed that Pirro’s office is doing things upside down: “present these positions and investigate them after they appear.”

“I have to say that this is becoming a real concern,” the prosecutor rebuked.

A different magistrate judge has criticized the Pirro office at least twice in recent weeks on similar trembling cases.

When asked to respond to Sharbaugh’s concerns, a Pirro spokesman defended his prosecutions during the increase in the application of the DC law.

“Fiscal prosecutor Pirro and his office, charging more than 1,700 cases, follow the evidence wherever he leads, constantly evaluating each case as he develops to rigorously follow the law and bring fast justice, including a dismissal when he is interested in justice,” said spokesman Tim Lauer, in an email.

An analysis of the Washington Post of 1,273 arrests during the acquisition of Trump DC found that a third of them involved federal agents, instead of local police with the Metropolitan Police Department. The illegal possession of weapons was the most common position, although 1 in 8 cases revolved around alleged minor crimes, such as the evasion of traffic or smoking marijuana in public.

The officers of the Metropolitan Police Department stop a driver during a traffic stop at a control point in the Ivy City neighborhood of Washington, DC, in August. President Donald Trump threatened that prosecutors sought the death penalty for any person convicted of murder in the district, a measure that would increase their repression of crime in the capital of the nation.
The officers of the Metropolitan Police Department stop a driver during a traffic stop at a control point in the Ivy City neighborhood of Washington, DC, in August. President Donald Trump threatened that prosecutors sought the death penalty for any person convicted of murder in the district, a measure that would increase their repression of crime in the capital of the nation.

To Drago/Bloomberg through Getty Images

“Many of the arrests began in the same way: a group of officers from several agencies of application of the law that approach the suspects for non -violent crimes,” the post said.

Trump’s statement about federal control over the application of DC Law expired a week ago, but has threatened to renew it if the city does not cooperate with the application of the immigration law. Even if there are fewer DHS and FBI agents enlist in the local efforts to fight the crime in the future, Pirro will continue to lead the office that processes Most of the city’s serious crimes.

It seems that not all prosecutors are on board with their aggressive accusation strategy. Last week, News themezone sat in two hearings in which prosecutors set out to inform the judge that they had just inherited the case because a colleague left the office. (If they renounced or were dismissed they were not noticed.) In both cases, the government was trying to dismiss charges for serious crimes.

Legal experts said that overload can be severely detrimental, not only for the defendants who sit in jail pending a hearing, but for the broader community and the faith that you need to put in the criminal justice system.

Randall Eliason, professor at the Law Faculty of the George Washington University and former prosecutor, said that pursuing inappropriate charges is “deeply unfair” for the defendants and a loss of court of the Court. Said a The key part of the work is “to exercise tax discretion” and decide what positions, if any, they deserve.

In his 12 years as a prosecutor in DC, Eliason said he Never a large jury returned an “without an invoice.”

“Routinely cowardly serious crimes even in trivial cases just because you want to seem difficult means that you cannot exercise that discretion correctly and is not doing your job,” Eliason said in an email.

He added that Pirro runs the risk of “undermining the credibility of his office” when trying to judge the numbers and make Trump’s acquisition look effective.

“If it seems that prosecutors simply automatically charge serious crimes without taking into account the facts, then jurors will be understandably more skeptical with prosecutors, even in cases where charges for serious crimes could be completely appropriate,” he said.

It is not likely that the most conspicuous cases of Pirro inspire public confidence.

In one, three great separate juries refused to accuse a woman of DC accused of pushing an FBI agent during an altercation with immigration officers. In another, a large jury refrained from accusing the “Sandwich type” of DC who allegedly hit a customs officer and border protection with a hoagie. Both defendants face positions for minor crimes.

“Everything is being prosecuted, even the smallest cases.”

– Todd Baldwin, DC defense lawyer

Paul Butler, a professor at the Law Center of the University of Georgetown and former prosecutor, said the launch of the sandwich had the act of a minor case of a minor crime.

“To demonstrate [the felony]prosecutors would have to demonstrate that he intended or tried to inflict death or serious body injuries, “said Butler.” Look at the Viral video And see how that could have resulted in death or serious body injuries. It is overload, and jury members may have thought that the evidence did not adjust to crime. ”

In the 1990s, Butler studied the concept of “Jury cancellation“, That is, jurors who block what they see as unjust prosecutions, specifically in Cases of DC drug possession. As in the apogee of the war on drugs, he said, prosecutors now run the risk of “losing the trust of the community” under the hard line tactics of Pirro.

“When they throw the book on people for minor crimes, this sense is assigned that many people in the black community have that prosecutors are willing to enclose everyone who can,” he said. “That interest is not as much public security as putting people in prison.”

The defense lawyers of the city have been overwhelmed by an increase in charges during Trump’s acquisition, according to Todd Baldwin, president of the Free Lawyers Association in the Superior Court of DC, where non -federal local crimes are processed. He said that his typical load of 35 or 40 cases shot at approximately 75. The beings on Mondays, when those locked during the weekend make their appearance in the initial court, they have Stretched after midnight sometimes.

Baldwin said that many cases of low level drugs that would have previously been rejected are now being prosecuted. In an afternoon last week, News themezone witnessed a man being prosecuted for possession of hashish.

“Everything is being prosecuted, even the smallest cases,” said Baldwin while he was at a break from his audiences.

“Is it for defense defense lawyers? Is it to flood the courts? That is what worries me,” he said.

The tension in judicial resources also worries Sharbaugh, the magistrate judge of the District Court. At Nguyen’s hearing on Tuesday, he said that the court personnel were being stretched by the cases that were presented and then withdrew.

“There is a feeling of frustration among us here,” said the judge.

Although Nguyen’s case was dismissed, it was made “without prejudice” – Which means that Pirro’s office is trying to reserve the right to bring a case against him again in the future. That has been a common issue in the charges that were thrown against several defendants in recent weeks. His defense lawyers, including those of Nguyen, have argued that they do not deserve to have the possibility of future prosecutions of criminals about their heads.

Anyway, Nguyen’s time in the Court may not have ended: he said that it is likely that he has a civil lawsuit for his arrest. He appeared before Sharbaugh in a Honda arm due to an injury that, according to him, was caused by the police. Outside the courtroom, he said that several work meetings were lost due to his blockade, as well as the anniversary of his father’s death. He said it was his only stay in jail and promised that it would be the last.

“I have tept like crazy”, said.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *