An Ohio lawmaker proposes a complete ban on combining artificial intelligence systems and granting legal personality

An Ohio lawmaker is taking aim at artificial intelligence in a way few expected. Rep. Thaddeus Claggett introduced House Bill 469, which would make it illegal for artificial intelligence systems to be treated like people. The proposal would officially label them as “non-sentient entities,” cutting off any path to legal personality.

And yes, it also includes a ban on marrying AI.

Claggett, a Licking County Republican and chairman of the House Innovation and Technology Committee, said the measure aims to keep humans firmly in control of machines. He says that as AI systems begin to act more like humans, the law must draw a clear line between person and program.

TEENS TURN TO AI IN SEARCH OF LOVE AND COMFORT

Sign up to receive my FREE CyberGuy report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive offers delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Guide to Surviving Scams, free when you join me CYBERGUY.COM fact sheet

What Would an AI Marriage Ban Do in Ohio?

Under the proposed legislation, AI systems would not be able to own property, manage bank accounts or act as company executives. They would not have the same rights or responsibilities as people. The bill also makes any marriage between a human and an AI, or between two AI systems, legally impossible.

Claggett believes the concern is not that robot weddings will happen any time soon. Instead, you want to prevent AI from assuming a spouse’s legal powers, such as having a power of attorney or making financial and medical decisions on someone else’s behalf.

The bill also specifies that if an AI causes harm, human owners or developers would be responsible. That means a person can’t blame your chatbot or automated system for errors or damage. The responsibility lies with the humans who built, trained or used the system.

Why Ohio is taking action on AI personality

The timing of the bill is not random. AI is spreading rapidly in almost all industries. Systems now write reports, generate illustrations, and analyze complex data at lightning speed. Ohio has even begun requiring schools to create rules for using AI in classrooms. And major data centers are being built to boost artificial intelligence infrastructure in the state.

At the same time, AI is becoming more personal. A survey by Florida-based marketing firm Fractl found that 22 percent of users said they had formed emotional connections with a chatbot. Three percent even considered him a romantic partner. Another 16 percent said they wondered if the AI ​​they were talking to was sentient.

That kind of emotional attachment raises red flags for lawmakers. If people start believing that AI has feelings or intentions, the boundaries between human experience and digital simulation will blur.

AI PEERS REPLACED REAL FRIENDS FOR MANY TEENS

The Bigger Picture: Keeping Humans in Control

Claggett said the bill is about protecting human agency. He believes that as AI becomes smarter and more capable, it should never replace the human decision maker.

Claggett told CyberGuy: “We see AI as having tremendous potential as a tool, but also tremendous potential to cause harm. We want to prevent this by putting in place guardrails and a legal framework before these developments can overtake regulation and bad actors start exploiting loopholes. We want the human being to be held responsible for any misconduct and for there to be no doubt about the legal status of the AI, no matter how sophisticated, in Ohio law.”

The proposed law would also reinforce that AI cannot make decisions that affect human lives without supervision.

If passed, it would ensure that no machine can act independently in matters of marriage, property or corporate leadership. Supporters see the bill as a safeguard for society, arguing that technology should never have the same legal basis as people.

Critics, however, say the proposal could be a solution to a problem that doesn’t yet exist. They warn that overly broad restrictions could slow AI research and innovation in Ohio.

Still, even skeptics admit the conversation is necessary. AI is evolving faster than most laws can keep up, and questions about rights, ownership, and liability are increasingly difficult to ignore.

What are other states doing about AI personality?

Ohio isn’t alone in rejecting AI personhood. In Utah, lawmakers passed HB 249, the Utah Legal Entity Amendments, which prohibits courts and government entities from recognizing the legal personality of non-human entities, including AI. The law also prohibits recognizing the personality of entities such as bodies of water, land and plants.

In Missouri, lawmakers introduced HB 1462, the “AI Responsibility and Nonsentience Act,” which would formally declare that AI systems are nonsentient and prevent them from acquiring legal status, marital rights, corporate functions, or property.

AI-GENERATED LAWYER Outrages Judge Who Scolds Man Over Fake Courtroom: ‘IT’S NOT A REAL PERSON’

In Idaho, HB 720 (2022) includes language that reserves legal rights and personhood to humans, effectively prohibiting claims to personhood by nonhumans, including AI.

These measures reflect a broader trend among state governments. Many lawmakers are trying to get ahead of AI development by setting clear legal boundaries before the technology advances.

Together, these proposals show that Ohio’s effort is part of a broader national movement to define where technology ends and legal personhood begins.

What does this mean to you?

If you live in Ohio, House Bill 469 could influence how you use and interact with artificial intelligence. Set clear boundaries that keep AI a tool and not a person. By keeping decision-making and responsibility in human hands, the law aims to avoid confusion about who is responsible when technology fails. If an AI system causes harm or makes a mistake, the responsibility falls on the humans who designed or implemented it.

For Ohio businesses, this proposal could bring real changes to daily operations. Companies that rely on AI to handle customer service, financial decisions, or creative projects may need to review how much authority those systems have. It may also require stricter policies to ensure that a human being is always overseeing important decisions related to money, health, or the law. Lawmakers want to keep people firmly in charge of decisions that affect others.

For everyday users, the message is simple. AI can be useful, but it cannot replace human relationships or legal rights. This bill reinforces that no matter how human-like technology appears, it cannot form genuine emotional or legal bonds with people. Conversations with chatbots may seem personal, but they are still simulations created through data and programming.

DETAILS OF TRUMP’S LONG-ANTICIPATED AI PLAN REVEALED BY WHITE HOUSE AHEAD OF MAJOR SPEECH

For people outside of Ohio, this proposal could signal what’s coming next. Other states are closely watching how the bill develops and some may adopt similar laws. If passed, it could set a national example by defining the legal limits of artificial intelligence. What happens in Ohio may determine how courts, companies and individuals across the country decide to manage their connection to AI in the years to come.

In the end, this debate is not limited to a single state. It raises an important question about how society should balance the power of innovation with the need to protect human control.

Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?

Do you think your devices and data are really protected? Take this quick quiz to see where you stand digitally. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing well and what you need to improve. Take my quiz here: Cyberguy.com

Kurt’s Key Takeaways

Ohio House Bill 469 is bold, controversial, and timely. It challenges us to define the limits of what technology should be allowed to do. Claggett’s proposal is not about stopping innovation. It’s about ensuring that as machines become more capable, humans remain in charge of the decisions that shape society. The debate is far from over. Some see this as a necessary safeguard, while others believe it underestimates what AI can bring. But one thing is certain: Ohio has highlighted one of the most important issues of our time.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE News APP

How far should the law go in deciding what AI can never be? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com

Sign up to receive my FREE CyberGuy report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive offers delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Guide to Surviving Scams, free when you join me CYBERGUY.COM fact sheet

Copyright 2025 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.