Congressman: It is fair to wonder if Pete Hegseth was drinking in the middle of the use signal
Washington-Representative Jimmy Gómez (D-Calif.) He said Monday that it is “just wondering” if defense secretary Pete Hegseth has been drinking alcohol again given its “reckless” signal use, a signal messaging application, to share highly sensitive military plans with national security officials and separately with members of his family.
“When Secretary Hegesh continues to make reckless mistakes with our national security, such as filtering war plans in signal chats or chaos we are seeing in the Pentagon, it is fair to ask if he really stopped drinking as he promised during his confirmation,” Gomez told News themezone in a statement. “People have legitimate concerns about whether their judgment looks compromised.”
A spokesman for the Department of Defense declined to comment.
“We do not comment on the comments of the elected officials,” said the spokesman.
AP
Before being confirmed, Hegesh faced numerous accusations of excessive consumptionSometimes at work. He averaged as nominated that he would not drink if confirmed.
“I’m not going to have a drink at all,” Hegseth said in December, before his confirmation audience. “It’s not difficult for me, because it’s not a problem for me.”
But Gómez, who is a member of the Select Intelligence Committee of the House of Representatives, has been raising concerns that Hegseth may be drinking in the midst of its signal use. He asked the question last month During a heated exchange With the senior intelligence officials, in response to the Bombshell report that Hegseth had used a signal to share war plans with national security officials, and another assistant Accidentally leave a journalist In the group chat.
On Monday, the California Democrat raised the perspective again in the light of the New York Times informing Sunday that Hegseth He shared almost identical war plans In another private group chat of the signal group last month with their family members, including his wife, his brother, his personal lawyer and a dozen others of his intimate circle.
We do not work for billionaires. We work for you.
The great monetary interests are directing the government and influencing the news it reads. While other points of sale are withdrawing behind the paid walls and bending the knee at political pressure, News themezone is proud to be not appealed and unilruled. Will you help us keep it like this? You can even access our stories without ads.
You have supported News themezone before and we will be honest: we could use your help again. We will not go back to our mission to provide free and fair news during this critical moment. But we can’t do it without you.
For the first time, we are offering an experience without ads to qualified taxpayers who support our intrepid journalism. We hope it will join us.
You have supported News themezone before and we will be honest: we could use your help again. We will not go back to our mission to provide free and fair news during this critical moment. But we can’t do it without you.
For the first time, we are offering an experience without ads to qualified taxpayers who support our intrepid journalism. We hope it will join us.
Support News themezone
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
We work for you.Non -billionaires.
The great monetary interests are directing the government and influencing the news it reads. While other points of sale are withdrawing behind the paid walls and bending the knee at political pressure, News themezone is proud to be not appealed and unilruled. Will you help us keep it like this? You can even access our stories without ads.
Protect free journalism
Support News themezone
Already contributed? Log in to hide these messages.
Gómez and other Democrats in the Intelligence Panel of the House of Representatives last month requested the director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard a Start an independent investigation In the signal chat debacle, specifically raising concerns that the impressive security violation may have compromised intelligence with American allies.
“This chat was reckless and put the lives of the members of our service at risk,” Gomez and another 10 members of the Committee to Gabbard wrote. “The information discussed would be classified properly both in the Department of Defense and in the office of the Director of National Intelligence Guidelines. Controls of other way to both the simple language of these classification guides and common sense.”
Gabbard, who was among those included in the chat of the initial signals with other administration officials, has not given any indication that this probe began.