FCC Cracks Down on Robocall Reporting Violations
NEWNow you can listen to News articles!
If you’re tired of scam calls going undetected, federal regulators just took a significant step. The Federal Communications Commission finalized new penalties targeting telecommunications companies that submit false, inaccurate or late information to a key anti-robocall system. The changes will take effect on February 5. Strengthen oversight of the robocall mitigation database, which plays a central role in tracking spoofed calls and holding providers accountable.
Sign up to receive my FREE CyberGuy report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive offers delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Guide to Surviving Scams, free when you join me CYBERGUY.COM information sheet.
What changed and why it is important
Under the new rules, voice service providers must recertify each year that their submissions to the robocall mitigation database are accurate and up-to-date. The FCC will now support that requirement with real financial consequences.

The FCC is cracking down on robocalls by tightening rules that govern how telecommunications providers verify and report call traffic. (iStock)
FCC Removes Its Own Reference to ‘INDEPENDENT’ Agency FROM WEBSITE AFTER DEM’S Testy EXCHANGE With President
This is what the commission approved:
- $10,000 fines for submitting false or inaccurate information
- $1,000 fines for each database entry not updated within 10 business days
- Annual recertification of all supplier submissions.
- The FCC also adopted a $100 filing fee for initial robocall mitigation database submissions and for required annual recertifications.
- Two-factor authentication to protect database access
- A $100 application fee for initial submissions and annual recertifications
The FCC also made clear that these violations are considered ongoing until corrected, meaning fines can accumulate daily rather than being treated as one-time penalties.
According to the FCC, many previous filings did not meet basic standards. Some lacked precise contact details. Others included robocall mitigation plans that did not describe any actual mitigation practices.
How the Robocall Mitigation Database Works
The Robocall Mitigation Database requires providers to verify and certify the identities of callers using their networks. Regulators and law enforcement rely on it to track fake calls and illegal robocall campaigns. That task is more difficult than it seems. The United States telecommunications system is vast and fragmented. Calls typically pass through multiple networks owned by major carriers like Verizon and AT&T, as well as smaller regional providers and VoIP services. When calls hop between networks, verification can be lost or ignored. For years, the FCC did not thoroughly verify or enforce the accuracy of these filings. That gap raised serious concerns.
Under the updated rules, providers who fail to recertify or correct poor submissions can be referred to enforcement action and removed from the database, which can prevent other carriers from placing their calls.
Why Inaccurate Robocall Data Hurts Consumers
When robocall presentations are incorrect or outdated, scam calls are more likely to reach your phone. Providers may consider a call as reliable even when it should raise red flags. That gives robocallers more time to operate and makes it harder for regulators to shut them down quickly. The FCC says it aims to close that loophole with tougher penalties and stricter oversight before consumers pay the price.

The FCC’s new penalties target inaccurate robocall filings that have allowed fraudulent calls to slip through carriers’ networks. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)
Rejection and pressure on the FCC
When the FCC proposed sanctions, it asked whether violations should be treated as minor procedural errors or serious misrepresentations. Telecommunications trade groups reacted. They argued that fines should not be imposed unless providers first have the opportunity to correct errors or unless the FCC shows that the filings were intentionally inaccurate.
State attorneys general and robocall monitoring platform ZipDX urged a tougher stance. They warned that false filings undermine all efforts to stop illegal robocalls. The FCC ultimately chose a middle path. He refused to treat the violations as harmless administrative errors. At the same time, it stopped short of imposing the maximum penalties allowed by law.
What does this mean to you?
For everyday consumers, this measurement matters more than it seems. Accurate robocall reporting makes it easier to track scam calls, stop criminals, and prevent fake numbers from reaching your phone. More severe penalties give telcos a reason to take these filings seriously rather than treating them as routine compliance tasks.
11 EASY WAYS TO PROTECT YOUR ONLINE PRIVACY IN 2025
The FCC also set a firm annual deadline. Providers must recertify their robocall mitigation submissions each year by March 1, creating a predictable compliance checkpoint. While this won’t end robocalls overnight, it reinforces a weak link that scammers have exploited for years.
Simple Steps You Can Take Right Now to Reduce Robocalls
Even with stricter FCC enforcement, scam calls won’t go away overnight. Here are some smart steps you can take today to reduce your risk.
- Do not answer unknown calls. If it is important, a legitimate caller will leave a voicemail.
- Never press buttons or say yes to robocall prompts. This confirms that your number is active and may lead to more scam calls.
- Report scam calls to your provider. Most major carriers allow you to report robocalls directly through your call log or app.
- Register your number in the National Do Not Call Registry in donotcall.gov/. It won’t stop scammers, but it may reduce legitimate telemarketing calls.
- Block repeat offenders. If the same number keeps calling, block it so your phone stops ringing completely.
- Be careful with callback numbers. Scammers often spoof local area codes to make them look familiar.
The FCC says accurate reporting of robocalls by telecommunications companies helps carriers identify and stop fraudulent traffic more quickly, but consumer habits still matter.
Pro Tip: Delete your personal data at the source
Robocalls don’t come out of nowhere. Many start with the sale or sharing of your personal information by data brokers. These companies collect phone numbers, addresses, emails, and even family details from public records, apps, purchases, and online activity. Scammers and shady sellers buy that data to create calling lists. Removing your data from data broker sites can reduce the number of robocalls you receive over time. You can try to do this manually by searching for individual data broker websites and submitting removal requests one by one. The process takes a long time and often needs to be repeated.
Some people choose to use a data removal service to automate this process and continually monitor new posting. That can help limit how often your phone number is circulated to marketers and scammers. Less exposed data means fewer opportunities for robocallers to target you. Robocall interruption often begins long before the phone rings.
Check out my top picks for data deletion services and get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already available on the website by visiting Cyberguy.com.
Get a free scan to find out if your personal information is already available on the web: Cyberguy.com.
Take my quiz: How safe is your online security?
Do you think your devices and data are really protected? Take this quick quiz to see where you stand digitally. From passwords to Wi-Fi settings, you’ll get a personalized breakdown of what you’re doing well and what you need to improve. Take my quiz here: Cyberguy.com

By strengthening oversight and accountability, the FCC aims to crack down on illegal robocalls before they reach your phone. (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)
Kurt’s Key Takeaways
Robocalls thrive when accountability fails. By adding significant fines, increased security, annual recertification, and filing fees, the FCC is signaling that accuracy is no longer optional. As penalties can continue to pile up until problems are fixed, telcos now face real consequences for ignoring or delaying fixes. This rule forces providers to take their role in stopping illegal calls instead of passing the blame up the entire network chain. Actual progress will depend on enforcement, but this is one of the clearest signs yet that regulators are closing the loopholes scammers rely on.
Do you think stricter penalties will finally push telcos to get serious about preventing robocalls, or will scammers simply find the next loophole? Let us know by writing to us at Cyberguy.com.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE News APP
Sign up to receive my FREE CyberGuy report
Get my best tech tips, urgent security alerts, and exclusive offers delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you’ll get instant access to my Ultimate Guide to Surviving Scams, free when you join me CYBERGUY.COM information sheet.
Copyright 2026 CyberGuy.com. All rights reserved.
Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson is an award-winning technology journalist with a deep love for technology, gear and devices that improve lives with his contributions to News and News Business since mornings on “News & Friends.” Got a technical question? Get Kurt’s free CyberGuy newsletter, share your voice, a story idea, or comment on CyberGuy.com.


