Weapons silencers, tan beds and other strange things hidden in the Republican party

Washington – When the Republicans of the House of Representatives approved the internal policy package of President Donald Trump in the early hours of Thursday, they not only approved to give billions of dollars in tax cuts to rich people while demolishing millions of poor people.

They made it easier to get weapon silencers. And silently removed a strange disposition on the tan beds. And extended a prohibition of the attention affirmed by gender. And, in a sample of loyalty to the president, they came up with a new name for the tax savings accounts that the government would sow with $ 1,000 for babies born in the coming years: “Trump accounts”.

Many things was already happening on the invoice of the Republican Party of 1,100 pages, which is actually called Bill’s only law. But things got confused on Wednesday night when Republicans presented A 42 -page amendment with all kinds of changes in the eleventh hour. They launched their new language when the Chamber Rules Committee was entering its validity 20 of a hearing on the bill, and the Democrats barely had time to make sense of all changes.

Now they are much clearer. These are some of the strange and last minute things that the Republicans raised their bill, which now goes to the Senate and already hitting a wall there.

Making it easier to get weapon silencers

Picture Alliance through Getty Images

To win the vote of the representative Andrew Clyde (R-G.), A member of the Freedom Freedom Caucus of the extreme right, the leaders of the Republican party slide the language to the bill, which facilitated the people to buy weapons silencers. Specifically, the bill eliminates a firearms registration rate of $ 200 for silencers and eliminates the requirement that people have to register their silencers.

During the hearing of the Committee of Night Rules, representative Mary Gay Scanlon (D-PA.) Howled on this “magical amendment” suddenly part of the bill. He pointed out that the Federal Tax on Wever Silers has been in force since 1934.

“It is a shameless attempt to facilitate the commission of violent crimes,” said Scanlon while trying without success to clear him from the bill. “I think this is cunning. I think it is a radical policy change without explanation of why this federal long data policy should be revoked in the middle of the night.”

The representative Jim McGovern (D-Mass.), The main democrat in the rules panel, tear the Republicans for sliding the provision of unrelated weapons in their tax bill.

“Frankly, what is in this draft reconciliation law, you know, make more to support murderers than American families,” McGovern said.

When a Republican in the committee laughed, the Massachusetts Democrat replied: “Do you know what? He talks to the police. He talks to people who have been victims of armed violence. I know you think it’s fun, but I don’t.”

Axinar – and then keep – a tanning tax

Via News

For some reason, the Republicans initially included language in the bill to repeal a federal special tax on tanning services in interior. But it seems that they were embarrassed to get it at the last minute.

Rep. Teresa Leger Fernández (Dn.m.) marked the disposition At the Audience of the Rules Committee on Wednesday and asked the president of the Committee of Forms and Media, Jason Smith (R-MO.), Who was testifying before the Committee, to read the line aloud. He refused.

“For the American public to know what this bill does … Could you read page 901, line 20?” Leger Fernández asked Smith.

“I think it would be better if you read it,” Smith replied.

“Oh, he doesn’t want to read it!” Leger Fernández said with a smile. “This is on their bill. They don’t want to read a line of their own bill.”

Representative Gwen Moore (D-Wis.) Eventually read the disposition out loud: “Section 11106 says: repeal of the Special Tax on Interior Broken Services.”

In the midst of more laughs, Leger Fernández contrasts the disposition, which makes it easier to have a tan bed, with the drastic cuts of the invoice with medicaid and food assistance. She took a chance of Trump’s tan habits and wondered out loud if he put that language on the bill.

“There are certain elected officials who seem to have a certain orange tone about them,” he said. “Maybe they want to make sure the tan beds get a little special credit.”

The arrangement of the tan bed had mysteriously gone in the final bill.

A willingness to let Trump operate like a king

Via News

The bill includes a language that tries to let Trump avoid the courts of the nation and essentially serve as king. Here is the alarming disposition of a prayer buried in the bill:

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES OF USA. UU.

Translated, this provision would restrict the ability of federal courts, including the Supreme Court, to enforce their decisions through contempt to the conclusions of the Court. It would apply to anyone, including Trump and members of their administration.

This language comes at a time when Trump has breached an order of the Supreme Court to “facilitate” the return of Kilmar Armando Abrego García, an American legal resident who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador. The administration has also been ignoring the orders of the lower courts to stop deporting migrants without giving them due process.

“It is a shameless power,” said Fred Wertheimer, president of the group in favor of democracy democracy 21, in a statement.

“This makes it more clear that the Republicans of the House of Representatives focus mainly on blocking contempt sanctions on the many current decisions that exist against Trump and his administration,” Wertheimer said. “This disposition is another step to turn our democracy into an autocracy. It must be blocked by the Senate.”

Expand a prohibition of attention affirmed by gender

Via News

A reporter with Eagle’s eyes first marked A slight change in writing In the final bill that significantly extended the prohibition of using medical or chip funds for the attention affirmed by gender. The republican party bill initially imposed this prohibition to minors, but their final language applies the prohibition to anyone who trusts these programs.

“The Republican Budget Law of the House of Representatives approved this morning that Anti-Trans policies are still a priority for both the party and the Trump administration,” said Imara Jones, CEO of Trans Lash Media, an independent news organization that tells the stories of transgender people.

“The fact that they are willing to prohibit medical care financed by the federal government for trans people of all ages, including adults in Medicaid and children enrolled in Chip, shows that the objective has been to push trans people in public life,” Jones said in a statement.

Creation of ‘Trump Accounts’ for New Babies (Really)

Via News

The Republican bill creates a new incentive for women to win more babies paying $ 1,000 for each American baby born in the next four years.

For babies born between January 1, 2025 and January 1, 2029, the Federal Government would deposit $ 1,000 in an account called “Trump account”. That money would be invested in his name in the financial markets, and when the baby grows, he or she can withdraw from her “Trump account” for things like going to college or buying a house. Child’s parents can also contribute to the account.

The Republican party decided that this money would be deposited in something called “Money Account for Growth and Progress”, or “Maga Account”. But that did not seem to absorb Trump enough, so at the eleventh hour, these accounts renamed him.

Reversion of the course on the sale of public lands in Utah, Nevada

Bloomberg through Getty Images

In a rare victory for people who care about the environment, Republicans eliminated the language of the final bill that would have allowed the sale of public lands in Nevada and Utah. The representative Ryan Zinke (R-Mont.), Who served as Trump’s interior secretary in his first term, had threatened to vote against the bill unless this language was stripped.

The environmental groups praised Zinke for their efforts, even if the general bill is terrible.

“The American people have spoken high and clear: our public lands should not be on sale,” said Athan Manuel, director of the Land Protection Program of the Sierra Club, in a statement.

“The members of the Congress on both sides of the corridor were right to throw this proposal to the garbage can, but a bad bill remains a bad bill,” he said. “As written, the Donald Trump’s reconciliation package is a raffle for corporate pollutions that would facilitate billionaires drilling, extracting and registering public lands that belong to all Americans, from the Arctic refuge to the desert landscapes of the southwest. “

Close up to a third of the Health Centers of Planned Parenthood

Alex Wong through Getty Images

The L EY Final could result in the closure of up to 200 Health Centers of Planned Parenthood, or one third of all these health centers throughout the country.

These closures would come as a result of the new prohibition of the invoice of the care that gender affirms for all patients with Medicaid and their provisions aimed at eliminating health plans that include the abortion coverage of the market of the health care law at a low price.

The consequences of the closure of these health centers would be “catastrophic,” said Alexis McGill Johnson, president and CEO of Planned Parenthood.

“If Congress approves its reconciliation bill as written, it is estimated that 200 Planned Parenthood health centers could close, leaving entire communities and regions without access to essential medical care,” Johnson said in a statement. “Cancers will not be detected, birth control will be more difficult to achieve, and public health infrastructure, already pushed to the edge, will break down.”

“Instead of really helping their voters, politicians want to prevent them from receiving attention in the Health Centers of Planned Parenthood and impose their beliefs on everyone else,” he said.

Most aggressive work requirements for Medicaid recipients

Kevin Dietsch through Getty Images

In the last minute, Republicans checked their invoice to accelerate the timeline to impose work requirements on Medicaid receptors.

After initially including the language that triggers these requirements at the beginning of 2029, the final bill increased the date at the end of 2026.

As a result of the strictest work requirement of the Republican Party for Federal Food and Food Programs, it is estimated that 14 million people can lose their health coverage, and 3 million homes can go without food assistance.

They do not completely screw federal workers outside retirement benefits

AP Photo/Mark Schiefelbein

Republicans originally used their bill to change the formula to calculate the benefits won from federal employees by based on the five best years of profits of a worker, compared to three years under the current law.

But in the end, they maintained the formula where it was. The representative Mike Turner (R-OHIO) was one of those who had delayed this change, saying that it was not fair to do this to current federal workers, who have already been supporting chaos, stress and fear of losing their work for months thanks to the careless work of Elon Musk and its substitutes in the so-called Government Efficiency Department.

“Make changes to pension and retirement benefits in the midst of someone’s employment is incorrect,” Turner said During a committee hearing on the bill last month.

“Changing the rules, especially when someone has already received their benefits, it’s wrong,” he said. “The benefits for employees are not a gift, they win.”

A random advantage for the recipients of the purple heart

Via News

If you are someone who received a purple heart during your military service and you are looking for more tax credits after its social security disability benefits be reduced because you got a job, this bill has covered it.

The Law of the Republican Party would increase the amount of its tax credit for the income won by the sum of its Social Security disability benefits terminated as a result of obtaining a job.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story erroneously indicated the state of a provision in the bill that would limit the ability of judges to keep people in contempt.