FBI officials expelled by Kash Patel claim that he knew that the shots were illegal

Washington (AP) -They high-ranking FBI officials were fired last month in a “compensation campaign” carried out by a director who knew better but ceded to the political pressure of the Trump administration to be able to maintain his own position, according to a federal lawsuit filed on Wednesday seeking the restoration of the agents.

The complaint states that director Kash Patel directly indicated to one of the expelled agents, Brian Driscoll, who knew that the shots were “probably illegal”, but he did not have to be able to stop them because the White House and the Department of Justice were determined to eliminate all the agents that helped President Donald Trump. He quotes Patel has told Driscoll in a conversation last month, “the FBI tried to put the president in jail and has not forgotten.”

AP Photo/Rod Lamkey, Jr., Archive

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Driscoll, Steve Jensen and Spencer Evans, three of the five agents known for having been fired last month in a purge that say that current and former officials have worried the workforce. It represents a legal challenge of the best steps of the FBI leadership scale to an avalanche of exits under the republican administration of Trump that has eliminated decades of experience. The dismissed agents have leveled the little flattering accusations of an agency to apply the law whose personnel movements are molded by the White House and guided more by politics than for public safety.

“Patel not only acted illegally, but deliberately, he decided to prioritize the politicization of FBI on the protection of the American people,” says the demand. He adds that “his decision to make him degraded the country’s national security by shooting three of the most experienced operational leaders of the FBI, each of them experts in preventing terrorism and reducing violent crime.”

FBI spokesmen had declined to comment after the agents were expelled.

Reputation damage concerns

In addition to reinstatement, the demand seeks, among other remedies, the award of the subsequent payment, an order that declares the illegal layoffs and even a forum to clear their names. He points out that Patel, in an interview with News Channel two weeks after the endings, said that “each person” discovered that the FBI had been eliminated from the leadership positions despite the fact that the demand says that there are no indications that none of the three would have done it.

“This false and defamatory public smear challenged the professional reputation of each of the plaintiffs, which suggests that they were more than the officials of the faithful and apolitical law, and has caused not only the loss of current government employment of the plaintiffs, but also damaged their future employment perspectives,” says the Suit.

Disconcerting requests of leadership

The three officials dismissed, according to the lawsuit, had participated and supervised some of the most complex works of the FBI, including international terrorism investigations.

“They were pináculos of what the rank and file aspired, and now the FBI has been deprived not only of that example, but has been deprived of a very important operational competition,” said Chris Mattei, one of the lawyers of the agents. “His shot from the FBI, taken together, has put all Americans at greater risk than when Brian Driscoll, Steve Jensen and Spencer Evans were in leadership positions.”

Another of his lawyers, Abbe Lowell, said the lawsuit shows that FBI’s leadership is “making political orders to punish police officers for doing their job.”

Perhaps the most prominent of the plaintiffs is Driscoll, a former commander of the specialized hostage rescue team of the FBI who served as an interim director between when the then director Christopher Wray resigned in January and Patel was confirmed in February.

In that work, he had a well -advertised confrontation in the early days of the Trump administration with a senior official of the Department of Justice, Emil Bove, for the demand of Bove of a list of agents who worked in the investigation on January 6, 2021, disturbances of a multitude of Trump supporters in the United States Capitol. Driscoll resisted the order in a dispute that led Bove to accuse him of “insubordination.”

Driscoll survived the dispute and took another high profile position that supervises the critical group for response to FBI incidents, or CIRG, which is deployed in crisis. But new problems emerged last month, says the complaint, when an FBI pilot whose tasks, including flying the private plane of the office, identified falsely on social networks as a case agent in the investigation on the granting of Trump’s classified documents in his Mar-A-Lago farm in Palm Beach, Florida.

The complaint says that Driscoll was told that the pilot, Chris Meyer, could no longer fly Patel on the FBI plane. Driscol accessed the request, but refused to strip Meyer completely from his pilot duties and resisted when he was informed of the wishes of the Trump administration to fire him.

The demand recounts a conversation in early August in which Driscoll told Patel that it would be illegal to fire someone for cases of cases. Patel, according to demand, said he understood that the actions were “probably illegal”, but that he had to say goodbye to whom his superiors wanted “because their ability to maintain their own work depended on the elimination of agents who worked in cases involved in the president.”

Meyer was fired later, but he is not among the plaintiffs in Wednesday’s demand.

Patel was chosen by Patel to direct the Office’s Washington Field Office despite a violent reaction of Trump’s loyal ones about his previous leadership role that coordinates the investigations on the Capitol mutiny. The demand says that even when Jensen was publicly defended by the leadership of the FBI, Patel and the deputy director Dan Bongino told him that they were spending “a lot of political capital” to keep him in the position.

Kayla Bartkowski through Getty Images

In May, according to the complaint, Bongino told him that he would have to fire an agent assigned to his office that had worked in cases related to Trump, but also investigations on officials of both important political parties. That agent, Walter Giardina, was also among the five who were fired.

Another plaintiff, Evans, says that it was the target of remuneration on its leadership role in the FBI human resources division during the start of the Covid-19 Pandemia, which made it responsible for reviewing the requests for accommodation of employees seeking the exemption of vaccine requirements.

That position exposed Evans to a flood of criticism from a former agent who demands that he regularly issued his complaints against Evans on social networks and kept access to Patel.

Evans was among the senior executives at the end of January to retire or be fired, but they gave him a break and allowed him to remain in his work as leader of the Las Vegas Campo Office. Despite being sure that he had the support of Patel and Bongino, they told him in May that he would have to leave his position.

On August 6, the demand says that Evans was packing for a new assignment of the FBI in Huntsville, Alabama, when it was notified that he had been fired. The declared cause was a “lack of reasonableness and excess of enthusiasm” in the implementation of COVID-19 protocols, although the demand says it does not remember to have denied an application for vaccination exemption.

___