Gabbard forbade intelligence on Russian-chucina negotiations with

Washington – As the Russian war progresses in Ukraine despite high level Meetings To discuss a possible path to peace, News themezone learned that Tulsi Gabbard, director of National Intelligence, issued a directive to the United States intelligence community weeks ago ordering that all the information about the Peace Negotiations of Russia-Ukraine is not shared with the allied intelligence partners of the United States.

The memorandum, dated July 20 and signed by Gabbard, ordered the agencies that they did not share information with the so -called five eyes, the World War II Intelligence Alliance that includes News themezone to News themezone. They talked about anonymity to discuss sensitive issues of national security.

The officials said the directive classified all the analysis and information related to the volatile. Russia-Ukraine Peace negotiations such as “Noforn”, or no foreign dissemination, which means that information could not be shared with any other country or foreign citizens. The only information that could be shared was information that had already been published publicly. The note also limited the distribution of material with respect to peace conversations within the agencies that created or originated intelligence.

Memorandum does not seem to avoid the exchange of diplomatic information collected by other separate media from the US intelligence community, or military operational information not related to conversations, such as the details that the United States shares with the Ukrainian army to help in their defensive operations.

Contacted by News themezone, the National Intelligence Director’s office sent questions to the White House, which did not answer.

“In general, the value of the FIVES EYES Intelligence Association is that when we are making and are making political decisions, we can both increase the intelligence of others and, therefore, know more about the plans, intentions and capabilities of our adversaries,” said Steven Cash, a former intelligence officer of the Central Intelligence Agency and the Department of Safety of Homelization.

“Among the reasons of this type of non -compliance is the expectation that we and the other four are sitting on the same side of the table with some other adversary on the other side,” Cash said.

He said that it is important that the allies have “a common intelligence image” so that the political leaders and the negotiators “can coordinate our positions and obtain the best treatment we can, or fight against the best war we can.” CASH is the executive director of the stable state, a non -profit organization composed of former intelligence and national security professionals of the United States and government officials related to threats to US democracy.

In March 1946, Winston Churchill spoke of the “special relationship” between the United States and the United Kingdom and the threat of the “iron curtain” that had “descended by the continent.” The United States and Britain forged their intelligence alliance in secret, signing an agreement to group information as a bulwark against the Soviet Union.

Later, Canada, Australia and New Zealand joined the agreement, transforming what began as a bilateral pact into the five -nations network that would be known as the Five Eyes.

But now, almost 80 years later, some former US government officials.

The National Security collaborator of CASH and News themezone, Sam Vidagrad, a former national security official, said that Five Eyes often has intelligence that helps the United States produce comprehensive intelligence evaluations, especially about Russia, given the access that the five eyes have to other sources of intelligence.

“Close our most reliable partners of intelligence evaluations could have a chilling effect on the critical intelligence exchange if our partners believe they are being excluded from key access, even in key matters in their region. They could decide to take similar steps to the United States,” said Vinagragra.

She added: “As for policies, if our five Eyes Partners think that they are being closed from key information. They could choose to create new structures and channels without us. The lack of complete collaboration with our closest partners could lead them to discuss issues that affect our national security without our opinion and perspective.”

Even so, other former intelligence officers argue that the Gabbard directive is common within the United States intelligence community, and criticism is a lot of noise of anything. They say that both the United States and the other members of the Intelligence Alliance often retain information from each other in divergent areas of interest. Ezra Cohen, a member of the Hudson Institute who served as Undersecretary of Defense of Intelligence in the Pentagon, suggested that the condemnation of the Gabbard’s note is probably derived from a disgust for the policies of the Trump administration and its leadership as director of National Intelligence.

“There is a lot of information that we do not share even with our five Eyes Partners, and it works on the back. There is a lot of eyes only in the United Kingdom. There is a lot of Australian material of only eyes,” Cohen said.

“Our interests are not always aligned with our Five Eyes Partners,” Cohen said. “And where we have divergent interests, and it’s not just Ukraine, we absolutely mark Noforn things.”

It admits that it is possible that the directive may result in depriving the United States of information, but maintains that these types of decisions have historically been the norm among the members of the five eyes. He said that the statement that the directive represents “a chill of the relationship” between the US and the five eyes seems “a bit like false outrage.”

As intelligence work and diplomatic efforts continue, largely outside the public eye, the war in Ukraine continues to affect a deadly cost. Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, condemned Moscow on Thursday for launching hundreds of drones and dozens of missiles in An attack during the night“As if nothing had changed at all. As if there were no efforts in the world to stop this war.”

• Tulsi Gabbard
• Ukraine
• Russia