Hasan Piker reflects on what could have taken Charlie Kirk to kill

Online Streamer online and political commentator Hasan Piker condemned a “culture of violence” in the United States after the murder of conservative activist Charlie Kirk.

“In less than two weeks, it was supposed to discuss Charlie Kirk,” Paker wrote in an opinion article of the New York Times published on Saturday.

Piker said he was broadcasting live when he learned of Kirk’s fright murder on Wednesday and was “shocked” for what he saw.

“It was the horror of seeing someone I know, not a friend or an ally, but a human being that I know personally and having debated before, is a victim of what clearly seems to be a wave of growing political violence,” he wrote.

Phillip Faraone/Getty Images for Politicon)

Until Saturday, the reasons for Kirk’s murderer were not clear. The shell covers of the weapon used to shoot Kirk were covered in messages that seemed to make reference to the culture and video games of Internet memes.

In the opinion article, Piker reflected on the factors he sees how to contribute to Kirk’s murder, expressing his desire to discuss these things with Kirk himself.

“I would have liked to ask Mr. Kirk about all these things,” he said, and said that the two “identified some of the same problems,” although they “collided” in causes and solutions.

Images of Benjamin Hanson / Middle East through News

The progressive influence noticed for the first time the high rates of deaths due to violent weapons in the United States, along with “feelings of isolation and resentment” that described as growing amid problems such as the increase in housing costs and inequality.

“The Americans inhabit a culture of violence to which we have usually become navigated,” he wrote, before presenting a connection between that culture and foreign policy of the United States.

“Over time, our culture of violence has directed people around the world, from Cuba to Iraq, people who serve as literal objectives for US weapons and bombs, absorbing what I consider the excess violence of Americans,” he wrote.

Later he continued: “A foreign policy organized around punishing and killing our supposedly sworn enemies, condemned diplomacy, transmits the terrible message that we can only kill and mutilate to achieve the world in which we want to live.”

Meanwhile, the prominent figures on the right have made references to being in “war” with liberals and Democrats following the death of Kirk.