The complainant alleges that Trump Doj told the lawyers to tell the judges

Washington-Emil Bove, who is the deputy attorney general and one of President Donald Trump’s judicial nominated, told the lawyers of the Department of Justice to say “fuck” the judges who ruled against him, according to a complaint filed by the former lawyer of Doj Erez Reuveni.

The lawyers of the Senior Department of Justice, led by Bove, deliberately lied to federal judges and disobeyed their orders in the case of the elimination of hundreds of immigrants to a prison in El Salvador, according to a complaint of complainants shared with the Congress. The complaint was First reported by the New York Times.

He complaint Archive by Reuveni, a lawyer from the Department of Justice of the Highly Praise career who was fired after declaring in the Court with sincerity that the administration had unfairly eliminated the resident of Maryland, Kilmar Abrego García, to El Salvador, alleges that the high -level government staff knowingly and the deliberately challenged judicial orders, directed their subordinated lawyers so that the subordinated lawyers are restless The courts and courts, and condemn the relevant lawyers of the orientation of the relevant lawyers, with the progress of the lawyers relevant to the orientation of the orientation of the orientation of the orientation of the orientation to the orientation of the orientation of the orientation of the orientation of the orientation of the orientation of the orientation of the orientation of the orientation of the orientation of the orientation of the orientation of the orientation Orientation on the presentation of lawyers. The priority of the administration of deporting non -citizens. “Reuveni is represented by Dana Gold and Andrea Meza, of the government responsibility project, a legal group of non -profit complainants.

Bove, whom Trump has nominated for a seat In the United States Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, he was the leader of this scheme within the Department of Justice, according to Reuveni. In a leadership meeting of the senior DOJ convened to discuss the removals of the alien enemies enemies law, Bove said that “they would have to consider telling the courts” fuck it “and ignore” any court order that prevents the elimination of immigrants to prison in El Salvador, alleges the complaint of Reuveni. He also alleges that the deputy attorney general attracted the fire deliberately to the Court that heard the case of removal as part of the scheme to deceive the court. Reuveni was also repeatedly pressed to lie to the Court and finally fired to refuse to do so.

Deputy Attorney General Blanche said that Reuveni’s claims are “completely false” in a Tuesday publication on social networks.

“The New York Times article describes the falsehoods supposedly made by a former discontent employee and then leaked to the press in violation of ethical obligations,” Blanche wrote in X, previously known as Twitter. “The claims about the leadership of the Department of Justice and the main associated general attachment are completely false, so the author gave the Department of Justice 15 minutes this morning to answer (they wrote that we did not” respond immediately with a comment “) before releasing this garbage.”

The White House did not respond to a request for comments.

Jeenah Moon through Getty Images

The news of Reuveni’s accusations occurs a day before Bove is ready to testify to the Senate Judicial Committee on his judicial appointment.

Senator Dick Durbin (Ill.), The main Democrat in the panel, said Tuesday that Reuveni’s accusations are more evidence of how Bove has “abused his position” in the Department of Justice. Bove previously He ordered the shots of federal prosecutors who worked in criminal cases derived from January 6, 2021, insurrection, and ordered professional prosecutors to dismiss corruption charges against the mayor of New York City, Eric Adams, in A clear agreement of Quid Pro quo.

“These serious accusations, of a lawyer’s lawyer lawyer who defended the immigration policies of the first Trump administration, not only speak of the fact that Mr. Bove do not comply with their ethical obligations as a lawyer, but demonstrates that their activities are part of a broader pattern by President Trump and his allies to undermine Reuvenence for Reuveni’s claims.

“I want to thank Mr. Reuveni for exercising his right to speak and bring responsibility to Mr. Bove,” Durbin said. “I implore my republican colleagues in the Senate: do not turn a blind eye to the serious consequences of confirming Mr. Bove to a position for life as judge of the circuit court.”

In particular, in his ethics, the disseminations presented to the committee before his hearing, Bove did not promise to challenge himself of any future demand that involves Trump.

Instead, he promised to challenge himself as “situations that present real conflicts of interests based on my current or previous positions in the Department of Justice.” Here is a screenshot of Bove’s comments to the Committee on how to handle challenges as a judge, of its nomination form, whose copy was obtained by News themezone.

Senate Judicial Committee

The actions alleged by Reuveni took place after Trump appointed members of two gangs as “alien enemies” under the alien enemies law on March 14. This designation presumably facilitated the ability of the administration to round and eliminate immigrants in the country. The Administration quickly began to gather hundreds of Venezuelan and Salvadoran immigrants who said they were gang members, often with flimless evidence or without evidence, and placing them in airplanes for the extraction of the notorious prison of Cecot in El Salvador.

That same day, Ensign invited Reuveni to a meeting that included Bove and other leaders of the DOJ, where it was stated that the revolts of the Alien enemies Law would begin on March 15 and 16. During the meeting, according to the complaint, Bove raised the possibility that a court blocked the remote and told the attendees that they may need the court and tell any judge “fuck” if they fell a court against the administration.

“Mr. Reuveni perceived that others in the room seemed stunned, and observed nervous and nervous looks between people in the room,” says Reuveni’s complaint. “Silence overcame the room.”

The Chamber seemed stunned “because, for the knowledge of Mr. Reuveni, no one in the leadership of the Department of Justice, in no administration, had suggested that the Department of Justice could blatantly ignore judicial orders, especially with a” fuck. “

However, the stunned “disbelief” of Reuveni, “is now a relic of a different moment,” according to his complaint. After this meeting, he witnessed senior leaders of the Department of Justice who lie to the judges and disobey judicial orders in three separate cases, he alleges.

In JGG v. Trump, the first case that came out of the removals to El Salvador, the Ensign lied to Judge James Boasberg during a preliminary hearing on March 15, since the administration was in the process of eliminating the alien enemies labeled to Cecot, Alica Reuveni alleges. When Boasberg asked Ensign if the removals would take place “in the next 24 or 48 hours,” Ensign declared: “I don’t know the answer to that question” and added that he “investigate” that and “informs you”.

“Mr. Reuveni reasonably believes that Ensign’s statement before the Court that he did not know if Aea’s removals would take place in the next 24 or 48 hours,” says Reuveni’s complaint. “Ensign had been present at the meeting of the previous day when Emil Bove clearly declared that one or more airplanes containing individuals subject to the AEA would take off during the weekend No matter what. “

Genaro Molina through Gettty images

Boasberg postponed the audience for a short period of time to allow Ensign to investigate. Elimination flights took off during this postponement. When the court met, Ensign continued to affirm that he had no information about the flights. The lawyers of the immigrant plaintiffs informed the court that the public flight data showed that two elimination flights had taken off and one third would leave soon. Shortly after, Boasberg issued a verbal order so that the flights return or not take off. But the administration did not comply with this order.

Reuveni states that, as it happened, he sent numerous emails to the Department of Justice, the State Department and the National Security Leadership Department that informs them about the Boasberg order, including one at 7:04 pm that indicates: “No one subject to AEA in our custody can be eliminated. And anyone must be returned in the air, unless you have a title title 8. He discovered on March 16 that the detainees had been exhausted in El Salvador and imprisoned in Cecot against the orders of the Court.

Reuveni learned that day that Bove was behind the alleged order to disobey Boasberg, since “he had advised DHS that, under the court order, he was allowed to exhaust people on the flights that left the United States airspace before the minute order was issued in the file.”

One of the people on those flights was Abrego García, who had previously received a retention elimination order that prevented him from being deported to El Salvador based on his fears that he could cause damage to the violence of the gangs. Illicit deportations, such as Abrego García, can occur in normal circumstances, and are generally corrected by returning the person to the United States, but the Trump administration did not want to do that in this case and, therefore, sought to manufacture accusations that Abrego García was a high -level “leader” gang and, under executive orders issued by Trump, a member of a foreign terrorist organization, according to Reuveni.

Reuveni states that he continued to press the lawyers of the DHS and the State Department to obtain information on how they would return to Abrego García, but was finally counted by the leadership of the DOJ, including the Ensign and the assistant attorney general Yaakov Roth, to “stop asking for facts that support any possible defense of the case.”

During a April 4 hearing in the case of Abrego García, Reuveni informed Judge Paula Xinis that Abrego García had been eliminated “by mistake”, as confirmed by a statement from the immigration official and compliance with the AD Uana Robert Cerna.

Reign then called Reuveni to ask him why he had not called Abrego García a terrorist and said he was unfairly eliminated. These questions came directly from the White House, said Ensign. There was no evidence that Abrego García was a gang leader or a terrorist, and that would not have an influence on his retention elimination order, Reuveni replied.

Reuveni states that he received a copy of a brief later that night that he was ordered to sign that he made these arguments to the court. He refused, telling his boss: “I didn’t register to lie.” The next day, on April 5, Reuveni was put on administrative license and subsequently fired on April 11.

The administration finally returned to Abrego García to the United States on June 6 to face traffic charges in Tennessee.

“Mr. Reuveni refuses to remain silent despite the reprisals he has already faced.”

– Of the complaint filed by Erez Reuveni

Before his dismissal, Reuveni alleges, he was also ordered to disobey a court order in the case of DVD V. DHS, where a judge ruled that the administration could not deport immigrants to countries that were not their country of origin without telling them where they would be deported and provide them with a fear assessment to determine if they faced possible damage or torture in those countries.

Reuveni’s complaint establishes that DHS and the leadership of the DOJ suppressed the guidance of the DHS that the judge had issued a national court order and, on the other hand, pretended that the decision was “ambiguous” and only applied to the three applicants appointed. The decision not to circulate this guide from the Bove office, Reuveni states that Ensign told him. The removals in violation of the order continued since the guide to stop them had not circulated.

As Reuveni sought to find out why the orientation had not been disseminated, they repeatedly told him to stop asking questions. On April 1, Roth called Reuveni to tell him that “Bove was very unhappy that Mr. Reuveni had contacted the lawyer of several agencies to determine if the Department of Justice had violated the court order.”

“Roth transmitted that Mr. Reuveni should stop sending an email to an agency lawyer on the matter to communicate on the phone only when possible,” says the complaint. “Mr. Reuveni understood that this instruction was based on the objective of the leadership of avoiding generating written material subject to dissemination through [the Freedom of Information Act]. “

Throughout all these episodes, Reuveni says he informed his supervisors who believed that he was asked to violate his professional and legal obligations as a lawyer. His dismissal, therefore, constituted illegal reprisals under the laws of protection of complainants, he says.

Since the dismissal of Reuveni, high -level Trump administration officials have presented it as a unfair partisan. It was a “sabotage, Democrat,” said the White House Cabinet Deputy Director Stephen Miller, in April In News. However, in his complaint, Reuveni recounts his 15 -year period as a non -partisan lawyer who was praised and promoted through multiple administrations, including Trump’s first term, where his performance review declared that he was an “outstanding lawyer, legal writer and oral defender” who manages the “most difficult and highest profile cases.” He received his last promotion on March 14.

“Mr. Reuveni refuses to remain silent despite the reprisals he has already faced and the serious risk of additional reprisals for his choice to continue exercising his rights,” says the complaint. “The consequences of the actions of the Department of Justice that Mr. Reuveni Informa has serious impacts not only for the safety of persons withdrawn from the country in violation of judicial orders, but also for constitutional rights and protections of all citizen and non -citizen persons for the same as they are potential victims of deliberate flagrant deliberate by due process and the state of law by the agency charged with the defense.”