The Republican Party lay to restrict the abortion pill with a new garbage science report

Republicans and right -wing media have risen to a New report Published by a group of conservative experts that states that the Mifepristone abortion medication is harmful to women. Experts tell News themezone that study is junk science, but that does not prevent abortion opponents from using it for more abortion pills restrictions.

The Center for Ethics and Public Policies published the report a few days after the FDA Makary Commissioner saying It has no “plans” to restrict the mifristone, which has been in the center of abortion wars since the fall of Roe v. Wade in 2022. Makary made several headlines For his comments, apparently ensuring the Probotist Americans that he would not take the approval of the FDA from the medicine.

But in that same interview, Makary also said: “As you know, there is a continuous set of data that are reaching the FDA in Mifepristone. Therefore, if the data suggests something or tells us that there is a real signal, we cannot promise that we will not act in those data that we have not yet seen.” President Donald Trump announced his intention to appoint Makary to direct the FDA shortly after the November elections, and the former News collaborator, who routinely spread the wrong information against abortion, was confirmed by the Senate last month.

The same day the report was published, Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) He sent a letter To Makary citing the previous statement of the FDA Commissioner and urging him to “follow these new data and take all appropriate measures to restore criticisms about the use of Mifepristone.” Hawley, an outstanding defender against abortion, asked Makary to restore certain requirements to access Mifepristone, that the administration drives down during the Covid pandemic. Hawley asked Makary to respond before May 15, adding: “The health and safety of American women depend on it.”

The moment of Makary’s comments, the Hawley report have triggered alarms among reproductive health groups.

“It is worrying that President Trump’s new FDA commissioner has refused to recognize the former Mifepristone registration of overwhelming security and efficacy,” Liz Wagner, main advisor to federal policies at the Center for Reproductive Rights, told News themezone. “And it is even more worrying that a” study “not reviewed by an anti -abortion group deeply reviewed, Dr. Makary gave an reporter that the FDA can act on ‘a real signal’ about Mifepristone.”

Makary, together with Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has said they will differ from new research on Mifepristone to determine if it is safe to use it. Kennedy even saying The president has responsible for studying the security of the abortive pill. But decades of evidence -based research and studies have already shown that Mifepristone is extremely safe and effective.

Katopodis / getty images

WHEN ASKED If the Fda is Consideing Hawley’s Request, An Agency Spokesperson Told News themezone: “The Fda is committed to safegating public health by by resenting the safety, eficacy, and quality of the products it regulaters. The agency rigorously evaluates the latest scientific dates Gold Standard Science to Make Reported Decions.

The agency also pointed to News themezone to Makary’s comment that the FDA can act if there is a “real signal” in the data on Mifepristona. When News themezone asked if the EPPC report is the “Set of continuous data that are reaching the FDA in Mifepristone“That was what Makary said, the spokesman did not respond.

Republicans have been biting access to the abortion pill through the FDA, either restricting how patients can get the medication or get it out of the shelves completely. The EPPC is a member of the Project Advisory Board 2025, an extreme right -wing policy agenda that details how to prohibit abortion throughout the country, including the restriction or prohibition of the mifristone using those named of Trump in the FDA. One of the two authors of the EPPC report, and the president of the group, previously worked at the Heritage Foundation, the group of extreme right -wing experts that led the 2025 project.

“Science is clear: the abortive pill is not safe for women and has never been,” Senator Steve Daines (R-Mont). tweeted. Senator James Lankford (R-Okla.) tweeted The report and wrote: “Read more to know the lies that the Biden administrator told women about this dangerous drug.”

The EPPC report states that it is the “largest known study of the abortion pill” and that almost 11% of women “experience sepsis, infection, hemorrhage or other serious adverse event within 45 days after an abortion of Mifepristona.”

Rachel Jones, the main research scientist at the Guttmacher Institute, said she would not call this document a “study” since it was not reviewed by pairs. The EPPC report does not include its data set and procedure codes, an unusual decision that makes other researchers completely evaluate the methodology and integrity of their results.

When News themezone arrived at EPPC to comment, the communications director Hunter Estes said the group cannot share the complete data set with the public. Estes told News themezone that the report was not reviewed by pairs because “the extensive pro abortion bias in the peer revision process” creates “there are no opportunities to publish an analysis reviewed by peers that offers important substantive criticisms of the pill or abortion abortion.”

“Even apart from all red flags with the data and the supposed analysis, the fact that they land in the recommendations, which have nothing to do with research itself, indicates that this was more driven by ideology than by scientific rigor,” Jones told News themezone.

For example, recommendations in the report include that Mifepristone should only be used up to seven weeks pregnant, but the data did not analyze the results due to gestation length. In addition, the authors recommend that only doctors provide mifepristone, but the analysis did not distinguish each other the pill was provided by a doctor or an advanced practice doctor. When asked how EPPC arrived at the policy recommendations included in the document, Estes repeated the recommendations published in the report.

“For 25 years, objective safety data has shown that drug abortion is safe, full stop,” said Wagner, from the Reproductive Rights Center. “If the named politicians in the FDA decide that the anti -abortion propaganda should influence their review process, the position and credibility of the FDA will decrease.”