The triumphs make all the white agenda has a new objective

“Woke is officially dead in Brown. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” Donald Trump declared in a social publication of truth last week.

He was celebrating the fact that the prestigious providence, Rhode Island, the University had just accepted an agreement with him. To restore its federal financing, the school agreed Implement anti-transgender policies and deliver your race and admission data.

It was similar to an agreement that the Federal Government had hit with Columbia University in New York after Trump relentlessly attacked school following pro-palestinian protests on campus.

And then on Thursday, Trump went further: he signed a Executive order demanding that Every University of the country deliver your admission data, citing a 2023 Decision of the Supreme Court Prohibit the use of race as a factor in university admissions. “Greater transparency is essential to expose illegal practices and, ultimately, free the society of shameful and dangerous racial hierarchies,” says the order.

There is already a growing fear of legal experts and defenders of higher education that this data could be assembled so that higher education institutions align with the objectives of their administration.

“They can use the data badly, they can interpret them in the way they want,” said Mariam Rashid, associate director of the Racial Justice and Equity Program of the Center for American Progress. “And they can also use it badly to inform the public.”

For example, the Trump administration could use racial data to affirm that a university is discriminating against a certain race, or inferring that Trump’s sufficient supporters are not admitted because the first year class does not have a sufficiently high percentage of students in red states.

Trump’s last strike over US institutions connects his War against diversity and its administration Assault on universities throughout the country in a way that could turbocate both. It is not just that Trump has an extraordinary amount of information about universities; It is how it is likely to use it to promote your false narrative about race and higher education. And it is the students who will support the worst part of the consequences.

“Given the defective interpretation of the administration of our Civil Rights Law, they could use these data to accuse the discrimination schools and threaten universities,” Donya Khadem, lawyer of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, told News themezone.

“It is unprecedented scrutiny by the federal government.”

– Donya Khadem, lawyer at the NaACP Legal Fund

Some schools refused to play the game. In April, Harvard University He wrote a letter Trump saying that his demands flew before the laws of freedom of expression and would suffocate the type of learning and research that occurs in a place of higher education. But other schools, such as Columbia and Brown, folded their knee and gave Trump what he wanted.

“It is very worrying because it is unprecedented scrutiny for the federal government,” Khadem said.

This time, administration is pointing to an aspect of educational life that has long been an error for conservatives. There is a generalized belief among conservatives that schools and universities have given advantages to color students at the expense of white students.

By allowing the breed to be a factor in the admission, the claim goes, the schools are taking stains of certain groups of students and, instead, admitting that the students who affirm are less qualified, based only on their race. (Actually, The breed has been one of the many factors Admission officers consider when choosing between fully qualified applicants).

“All this is motivated by a racist myth that blacks do not deserve to be in these elite spaces, ”said Khadem.

And now that Trump is back in office, having in his hands in these data is probably the beginning of his attempt to go back to admit to color students.

When asked about how he intends to use admissions data, the Department of Education addressed News themezone to a Press release On the new executive order that Trump signed on Thursday.

“We will not allow the institutions to commit students’ dreams by assuming their skin color matters more than their hard work and achievements”, the Secretary of Education Linda McMahon saying.

Photo by Sam Hammat/The Boston Globe through Getty Images

The conservatives celebrated when the United States Supreme Court University admission processes aware of the career. In students for just admissions v. Harvard in 2023, saying that schools cannot use the breed as a factor in university admissions.

Harvard, together with his accused partner, the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, had argued that schools should consider race as a factor among many to guarantee the educational benefits of a diverse student body. The Superior Court did not agree, saying that schools did not have a “convincing interest” when considering race as a factor and, therefore, violated the 14th amendment.

But experts in educational law say that the federal government is using that decision and expanding it far beyond its original intention.

In the same ruling, the court expressly expresses saying That “nothing prohibits universities from considering the discussion of a applicant on how the breed affected the life of the applicant, provided that this discussion is specifically linked to a quality of character or a unique capacity that the particular applicant can contribute to the university.”

Now, Trump’s order undermines that.

“They are using students for fair admissions [decision] So they are not what the judges meant when they wrote it, ”said Khadem.

Education defenders fear that the administration obtains racial admission data can make universities a more hostile place for color students.

“Student data could be used to challenge the admission of black students in particular under assumptions that they are allegedly qualified due to their career,” said Janel George, a law professor at Georgetown University, to News themezone.

“All this is motivated by a racist myth that blacks do not deserve to be in these elite spaces.”

– Khadem

He could also turn off the qualified students to attend some of these universities. “I think it’s a great deterrent element,” Khadem said. “The Columbia campus has become and will continue to be less cozy for black students.”

Columbia and Brown did not immediately respond to News themezone’s request for comments.

Systemic racism and inequality are already significant barriers for university assistance. Research shows that black students and other people of color are more likely to be low -income families and Fight to pay the university. Then there is the fact that standardized tests are frequently used in university admissions are biased to white students and those of richer families.

Studies have shown that Neutral breed admissions processes to a fall in diversity. In 1996, after California voters approved a measure that would prohibit the affirmative action in the State’s public universities, the most prestigious schools in the State saw A drastic fall in diversity. In fact, one of the arguments made by Harvard during his legal fight was that No neutral breed admission process It offers the same benefits of diversity.

The first university classes enrolled after the students for the just admissions failure varied in their diversity. Some schools, such as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the University of Tufts and the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill, He saw a decrease In black and Hispanic inscription, while racial compositions of other schools remained approximately the same.

These changes could not only hinder access to higher education for non -white students, but there is a matter of how to make public this data could damage students. If the Trump administration publicly calls a school for having a certain number of non -white students, that could become a problem for people on campus.

“I think it’s harmful,” Rashid said. “[The data] It will not be attached to a name, but they can invent any narrative they want. ”

Experts warn that it could create a hostile environment on campus, where non -white students feel that their classmates believe they are not qualified to be there. “In schools with greater admissions of black students or teachers, some people will feel in a certain way about how they are perceived in school,” Khadem said.

There is a direct line of Trump attacks to universities to the largest anti -diversity campaign in its administration.

In an attempt to start eliminating people in public life, Trump signed an executive order In January, that sought to end the diversity, equity and inclusion programs in different institutions, including non -profit organizations that receive federal subsidies, agencies for the application of the law and institutions of higher education. The penalty for not ending with Dei, although vague, was the loss of crucial federal funds.

The Department of Education followed Orientation for educational institutionstelling them that they must end the “racial preferences” and restore “merit.”

The Department of Justice also joined the Crusade, launching investigations from schools and universities that they claimed were not complying with the decision of the Supreme Court on the use of the race in university admissions under the pretext of combating “illegal discrimination.”

“He [DOJ] will end a shame system Zoso in which someone’s race matters more than his ability ”, the interim associated attorney general Chad Mizelle He said in a press release In March.

For the Trump administration, American society and universities in particular, have been harassed by a racial regime that disadvantages white conservatives, and this executive order intended to combat that. Others, however, see a very different agenda.

“What they want to do is make everything neutral Rashid said. “In other words, make everything white.”