Whoopi Goldberg calls the triumphs of $ 5,000 for the baby bonus for exactly what it is
The only thing that “View” hosts delivered faster than the “baby bonus” promise from Donald Trump was his skepticism.
In Wednesday episode of “The View” The host Whoopi Goldberg initiated the segment of hot topics with a raised eyebrow, presenting the white house plan to combat birth rates in the United States.
“The White House is looking to offer cash bonds of $ 5,000, expanded access to IVF, along with other incentives for women to have more babies,” he said, with a sarcastic smile.
Goldberg does not accelerate the words, calling the idea “incredibly insulted” and argued that the administration “does not know how women’s bodies work, and they don’t know what it costs to raise a child or simply have a child.”
Lorenzo Bevilaqua/ABC through Getty Images
He even made some fast calculations, pointing out that after taxes, the alleged $ 5,000 would be reduced to around $ 2,500 after uncle Sam received his cut. He later addressed his fellow panelists and asked his thoughts about the proposal.
Sara Haines did not stop, saying that the proposal was comparable to “put a curite in a deeper problem.”
“We have not paid the family license in this country or subsidized child care, ”he said, adding that maternal mortality rates remain alarmingly high, a reality believes that the administration should prioritize over population incentives.
“I am one of those people who feel that the earth is overcrowded,” Haines continued. “They want more babies because it affects not only the workforce, but also to pay in law programs,” he said, and pointed out that they lack the general panorama.
She suggested that the administration focus on preparing for the emergence of artificial intelligence, which she thinks will have a greater long -term impact on social systems than birth rates.
Lou Rocco/ABC through Getty Images
Sunni Hostin also intervened, saying that Americans should be asking not only that is being proposed, but because – And for whom.
Meanwhile, Goldberg remained unvarmed by the figure of $ 5,000, qualifying him as an offensive in the context of the same social programs in which the Government has marked in recent years. Before I could finish, Alyssa Farah cut: “Isn’t it something better than anything?”
Goldberg replied: “No!”
Farah tried to make comparisons, arguing that if then President Joe Biden had proposed the same plan, he would have been acclaimed as “innovative.”
Goldberg quickly had a refutation for his partner panelist.
“I don’t like the idea that someone is saying: ‘I’m going to pay him to have more children,” Goldberg said. “If you want people to have children, you should not scare them by cutting all these programs that you may need.”